The Palestine Telegraph

Sunday
Mar 21st
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Uranium Weapons - Does anyone care about our planet? (Part 4)

E-mail Print PDF

earth_handUSA, August 14, 2009 (Pal Telegraph)-  We have seen governments and military refuse to accept that uranium based weapons have been used in all the theatres of war. Only when independent tests and conclusive evidence is provided do these authorities back down. We have seen this in the Balkans, Kuwait, and Iraq. We now have good evidence from Afghanistan, with further news of a leaked German document. Now we only have three more to go, Lebanon, Gaza and Pakistan. We already know what the final outcome will be but it takes time for such authorities to admit to their cover-ups and lies.

Once the cat is out of the bag we see a rush of activity by those governments to apply pressure to the UNEP and WHO to go out into the field to check the levels of contamination (as if they don't know already). The respective teams return to their headquarter and in conjunction with the governments, ICRP and IAEA prepare a well worded document declaring that there were no significant findings and that the levels found met with normal background radiation. They then repeat that the traces of depleted uranium or enriched uranium found were insignificant and all fall within permitted levels and do not pose any risk to troops or the civilian population. What they don't tell you is that the figures are all unrealistic and that their methodology of using the ICRP model is totally flawed and outdated when dealing with DU or Low Level Radiation (LLR), especially when it has been inhaled.

Leuren Moret raised awareness in one of her reports regarding the ICRP Model.  Based on 550 epidemiological studies of exposed populations, an independent low-level ionizing radiation report for the European Parliament, the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) report has stated that chronic exposure to low-level ionizing radiation is: "...up to 1000 times more biologically damaging than the International Committee on Radiation Protection (ICRP) standards and risk model predict".  The ICRP standards and risk model are based on the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bomb studies, which were deceptively conducted by the U.S. Government, in order to protect the future development of a nuclear weapons program.

Since the commencement of the current series, I have copied all these press release to the following : Permanent Observer Mission of Palestine to the United Nations - Dr Riyad Mansour - Ambassador and Permanent Observer. Dr Hussein Abdel-Razzak Al Gezairy - WHO Regional Director - East Med and Respective Country Representatives.

It was my intention to communicate only with those directly responsible for the Middle East region. I had hoped in doing so that this would generate some form of response, as they work and live in the areas where Depleted and Enriched weapons have been used. One would also assume that they would pass these reports up to their higher authority in the UN and WHO headquarters. All of my emails have also been copied to the respective country representatives for The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Red Crescent, Norwegian Refugee Council and the Middle East Media. I have since emailed the Islamic Human Rights Commission with copies of the series, as it is the Islamic Nations that have taken the full brunt of this onslaught.

Banner2

To date I have not heard from any of those who control the region or the media despite the fact that each and every day weapons with uranium components are being used.  Each and every day people are dying from their usage and the medical statistics in each of their respective regions are showing sharp rises in many forms of cancers, diabetes, infertility and genetic mutations resulting in gross birth defects. I concluded my email to the above as follows:  "All my emails to you will be kept on record as evidence that you all have been notified along with your respective lack of responses......maybe one day you will be called to give evidence in an International Court.......then what will you say?

I believe the use of depleted and enriched uranium must now be labelled as the greatest genocide ever to exist and will be ongoing. With a half life of 4.5 billion years the future is rather bleak to say the least.

There is a direct link between the inhalation, ingestion and absorption of depleted and enriched uranium contamination in the entire Middle Eastern region and the corresponding medical statistics that are showing up since these weapons were used. The contamination as we have learnt does not respect international borders and therefore the problem has now become a global issue.

I spoke with Leuren Moret about these frightening statistics and her response gave me a full account of the medical implications. She gave particular reference to the inhalation of Low Level Radiation Nanoparticles:  "Uranium and phosphate structures have a strong chemical affinity for each other. The DNA and the mitochondria are phosphate rich and therefore there is a strong attraction between uranium, the DNA and the mitochondria. Once the uranium has attached to the DNA and or the mitochondria it does damage from the chemical heavy metal effect, the radioactivity released and the particulate effect.

But the greatest damage to the DNA and mitochondria by uranium is the photo-electron effect. Uranium not only releases its own energy in the form of alpha particles and gamma rays, but it absorbs other energy released in the cell and releases that absorbed energy as a shower of photo-electrons that annihilate whatever the uranium is attached to. This was first described by Dr Chris Busby, a Low Level Radiation (LLR) expert for the British Government and the European

Parliament.

DU_Black_and_White2

US Army scanning electron microscope image of tiny DU particles produced from firing DU munitions. 35% of those produced by firing artillery are in the nanoparticle range. The Army classified this report 20 years after it was out in the public sector, after they found out I had copies of it and was spreading it all over the world.

 

As a result the very dangerous health effects of uranium exposure it has been reported that large increases in diabetes since 1945 is linked to radiation and specifically uranium exposure. Pregnant women with diabetes, that is untreated, produce very weak babies that develop cancer, heart defects and other birth defects and illnesses. Uranium exposure causes a web of diseases such as neuro muscular disease, diseases of the brain, gastro intestinal illnesses, heavy metal poisoning, skin rashes and dermal contact with the skin causes high increases in melanoma and other skin cancers.

The greatest damage from radiation exposure is to the unborn foetus and this genetic damage to the foetus is passed on to all future generations. Basically uranium exposure is a slow painful death from long lingering illnesses. Surprisingly with depleted uranium (DU) exposure cancers and diabetes have been reported to develop as early as two months after exposure. That is a new feature associated with depleted uranium (DU) as well as multiple cancers in patients that are genetically unrelated. In other words individual cancers form from the effects of individual particles in the victims tissues. This is due to the particulate effect from the very tiny nanoparticles of depleted uranium.

Burning uranium from dirty bombs, dirty missiles and dirty bullets produce a radioactive gas composed of very tiny particles of uranium oxide that are produced when the shells leave the gun barrel and throughout its trajectory to the impact sites. From this impact site large volumes of radioactive gas are produced that escape into the atmosphere where they are carried locally, across border, and around the world in a few weeks. They remain suspended in the atmosphere until they are rained out into the earth's environment, usually within two months. The depleted uranium (DU) particle contaminates the air we breathe, the water we drink and the food we eat.

The tissues in our bodies filter out the depleted uranium particles from the blood and cause a web of diseases called "Gulf War Syndrome". Radiation is different. It respects no borders, no socio economic class, and no religion. There is no way to turn it off and no way to clean it up. It's the weapon that keeps giving and keeps killing. The half life of depleted uranium is 4.5 billion years. It is the "Trojan Horse" of nuclear war. All of the above information has been provided by Leuren Moret and Dr Chris Busby for whom I have great respect.

 

North_American_Cancers2

Breast cancer mortality: 2/3 of all breast cancer deaths in the US occurred in the areas shown on the black & white map showing counties effected 1985-89 (Source: Center for Disease Control). Colour Map shows of US nuclear power plants. Leuren Moret

 

Professor Katsuma Yagasaki, a scientist at the Ryukyus University, Okinawa, Japan. In his article - Depleted Uranium Shells, the Radioactive Weapons - Perpetuation of War Damage by Radiation wrote:  Internal Exposure - When uranium burns into particles, it will enter human bodies ingested with drinking water and food, or inhaled with air. In this case, the whole radiation and chemical toxicity will be released in the body. Effects of chemical toxicity differ according to the state of uranium, whether it is water-soluble or not, but there is no difference in its harmfulness as radiation.

A depleted uranium particle of ten micrometers in diameter would release one alpha particle in every 2 hours, totalling more than 4,000 in a year. Alpha rays continue to injure human cells, giving no time for the injured cells to heal. Further, Uranium-238 decays into a daughter nucleus thorium-234, whose half-life is 24.1 day, and Th-234 decays into a granddaughter nucleus protactinium-234, whose half-life is 1.17 days. Pa-234 then becomes another element (U-234; 0.24 million years of half-life), forming a radioactive chain. Th and Pa release electrons to decay (beta decay). Six months later, Th and Pa will have reached "radioactive equilibrium," having the same radiation dose as U-238. At this stage, the penetrated DU particles now emit alpha particles, beta particles twice as much as alpha, and gamma rays accompanied with each decay.

As alpha particles do not travel farther than 40 micrometers, the whole damage will be given to the flesh 40 micrometers in radius. The annual radiation dose received by the exposed area of the flesh 40 micrometers in radius would amount to 10 sievert (as described later) only by alpha ray emitted from a depleted uranium particle of ten micrometers in diameter, ten thousand times higher than the dose limit.

One alpha particle passes hundred thousand atoms before it stops, blowing out hundred thousand electrons constituting a molecule. The destruction (ionization) of molecules will damage DNA, or will induce mutation in the cellular structure itself. There will be a great possibility of only one depleted uranium particle causing cancers and organ disorder. With the half-life of DU being 4.5 billion years, there will be almost no change in the rate of alpha emission 10,000 or 100,000 years later. This means once DU is inside the body, one will remain exposed to radiation as long as he/she lives unless it is discharged, while the
environment continues to be polluted forever.

Regrettably, investigations carried out by the World Health Organization and other institutions do not go deep into the realities of internal exposure. For example, the U.S. Department of Defense states that it does not find relationship between DU and the cancer incidence in Iraq (from a scientific report made by the Research and Development Corporation on cancers and DU on the Pentagon budget).

The investigations conducted by the WHO and European Community made the same conclusion. These researches determine that the radiation level found in Balkan and Iraq is not harmful to health. Yet in reality in both places there are many cases of babies born with birth defects and the high incidence of cancers. What is the purpose of those researches? It is fair to say that their role
is to cover up the facts about the damage caused by DU and the responsibility for the use of atrocious weapons. Meanwhile, a non-governmental organization called Uranium Medical Research Center conducted a urine test instead of the environmental research, and found the presence of high levels of uranium in Afghan citizens.

Looking into DU munitions in terms of radiation they produce, they have two
characteristics.

(A) First, the used amount of radioactive atoms of DU weapons dispersed into environment in the real wars was far beyond that of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is estimated that in the First Gulf War, 320 to 800 tons of DU were used, scattering indeed 14,000 to 36,000 times more radiation than in Hiroshima. In the recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, at least 500 tons of DU shells were said to be dropped.

(B) Second, while most of the radiation released by the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki had very short half-life periods, DU has an extremely long half-life of 4.5 billion years. Dose amount of DU will last in the same level of as ever even after tens of thousands years. Residents in the DU-affected area will have to live forever, for generations to generations, under threat of radiation. Humankind has never experienced such horrible damage of war. Any radioactive weapons, as well as nuclear weapons, must never be allowed to use.

I would like to thank Prof Katsuma Yagasaki for his help and dedication in trying to prohibit uranium based weapons, especially DU.

Professor Malcolm Hooper, advisor to British Gulf war vets and Emeritus Professor of Medical Chemistry provided an overview of possible paths of toxic DU exposure to veterans. Most of these paths have been poorly studied if at all. Hooper noted the significance of recent research demonstrating that alpha-radiation induced cell damage can be passed on by biological action to adjacent cells, multiplying the damage. He underlined the "don't look, don't find" problem with current medical research and the reality experienced by veterans.

Baghdad University Professor of Molecular Biology Huda Ammash reviewed studies undertaken since 1996 by Iraq to inventory soil, water, air, plant, and wild animal samples from 200+ sites for evaluation for DU. She showed tables describing increased cancer incidence statistics, and informed us that Basra province, where most DU munitions were fired, accounts for 2/3 of the recorded increases in Iraq's post-war cancer mortality.

UK Ministry of Defence quote on their webpage: "Inhalation of insoluble material presents a third and predominantly radiological risk from material lodging in the lung and increasing the lifetime risk of cancer. There may also be cause for concern arising from the transport of DU from the lung to the lymph nodes". "Inhaled DU particles, dependent on their size, may not rapidly disperse by natural processes and may remain lodged in the lungs. The consequences of this in humans are uncertain. Animal studies have shown some evidence of radiation induced fibrosis of tracheo-bronchial lymph nodes after inhalation exposures to U. McDiarmid suggests that further studies of the potential neurocognitive effects of DU are warranted in the light of evidence that DU crosses the blood-brain barrier in rats",

Tedd Weyman, BSW, MEd (HROD), Deputy Director and Field Investigations
Team Lead - The Uranium Medical Research Centre - Toronto, Canada with field studies in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine.

Tedd during his investigation in Afghanistan collected post-ballistic debris samples at a Taliban army depot bombed by Operation Enduring Freedom on the outskirts of Jalalabad. The bombsite was confirmed by laboratory analysis to contain non depleted uranium at levels elevated 57 times normal.

Again we see evidence emerge that follows the same pattern time and time again. Tedd's samples revealed Non DU which corresponds with Dr Chris Busby's findings in both Lebanon and Gaza. It is remarkable that the governments responsible for these respective attacks still deny the use of uranium based weapons. The victims in these areas of conflict are not only the innocent civilians but also the military forces taking part. Basically the military is killing its own men by contamination. It was interesting when Doug Rokke once made a statement regarding the troops "If you go to war you will die". When I spoke with Doug recently he told me that we are looking at a potential figure of around one million military men being disabled. Many of them will fall victim to the consequences of uranium based weapons. These men that risked their lives have been totally abandoned on the issue of Low Level Radiation inhalation. Why would anyone want to join the armed forces under the current US weapons programme? When will the respective governments accept their liability?

Tedd Weyman in his "Twelve Year Too Late " article pointed out that two governments reports from the US and Canada are an acknowledgement how these two governments failure to conduct reliable DU studies is a calamity for veterans. Both Defense Departments admit significant limitations in their laboratories' abilities to carryout radiological and bio-assay screening programs and glaring weaknesses in clinical, DU follow-up programs. These papers and the U.S. DOD's Environmental Exposure Reports on DU in the Gulf and the
Balkans reveal, by their own admissions, the use of inadequate testing equipment, a lack of understanding of the fundamentals of metabolised uranium and radiation dose effects, and sub-standard scientific procedures.

Later in his article he draws reference to NATO, CDC, NRC, IOM the UN's subsidiary agencies (WHO, UNEP, IAEA), and the U.S. Defense and Veterans Affairs Departments. He points out that veterans have to face a myriad of biased opinions and carefully constructed "facts". The supposed, responsible objectivity of these organisations is belied over and over again by their incessant efforts to write reports to substantiate pre-determined conclusions.

Chris Busby gave more convincing evidence when he reported new findings of Uranium in the air filter from the engine of an ambulance which was driven in the Lebanon in 2006 until it was shot up on day 16 of the conflict between Hizbollah and the Israel Defence Force. The report also contains further analysis of soil samples which confirm the presence of enriched uranium. Analysis of the filter contents by Harwell Scientifics unequivocally reveals the presence of enriched Uranium (EU), confirming findings of the same material in two bomb craters in the Lebanon. As previously reported on his web site, the crater samples have been analysed by two laboratories in England and Wales with very similar results.

xin_520703261037697211442

The filter analyses suggest strongly that weapons deployed in the Lebanon contained EU and that contamination of the country has been widespread and significant.

 

Chris Busby's report is impressive to say the least. It clearly shows factual evidence as follows - The image below reveals the presence of a hot particle, probably about 80 microns in diameter. Two such particles were found by exposing half of a single piece of CR39 plastic the size of a microscope slide to part of the air filter for 15 hours. (The other half of the CR39 was used as a control and was not in contact with the filter.) In other words, two particles were found in about one square inch of the filter medium.

Most of the Uranium particles created by the impact of Uranium weapons are far smaller than 80 microns. Smaller particles will have passed through the filter fabric, especially those around 1 micron in diameter which are the greatest part of the particles arising from Uranium weapons. We are therefore seeing only the merest indication of the material that is available for people and animals to inhale. In the interests of public health it is vital that methods of monitoring the entire region are deployed with urgency.

lebanonstar

The cluster of impressions (upper right) is an alpha star etched in CR39 plastic by a hot particle of enriched Uranium.

 

Because of the complexity of the evidence and the broad area that it covers I will issue another article on the medical/ health aspect of both DU and EU weapons (Part 5).  Afterward, I will dedicate one whole section to the very large group of War Vets from the Balkans, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza and of course we can now expect War Vets from Israel who will be adding their problems to the long list of other international military personnel. I also know that as a result of uranium based weapons being used more recently in Pakistan their members will soon be added to the list.  It is also essential that we cover the huge civilian populations around the many areas of conflict which amount to millions.

To conclude: This war against government neglect and lack of credibility will only be won by the combined effort of the independent experts and those that bring such horrific stories into the open. People power can also play a significant role by lobbying your own governments and members of Congress/Parliament. It is your duty of care as a global citizen to protect our planet and all those that live in its environs.

 

 

Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant 11/8/2009

 

 

 

 

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Faves! Free Joomla PHP extensions, software, information and tutorials.
Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments
Add New Search
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.21.xxx |2009-08-14 14:40:23
To the lay person the European Committee on Radiation Risk may sound like an official body with a
mandate or endorsement from the European Parliament. The UK’s Health Protection Agency made the
following statement in 2003: “The ECRR is a self-styled organisation. In particular, it does not
have formal advisory responsibilities to the European Commission or to the European Parliament. The
ECRR report (Green Audit, 2003) is published by the special interest group, Green Audit. Dr Busby,
of Green Audit, is secretary of the ECRR and lead author of the report. Many of the arguments
contained in the report have appeared previously in Green Audit papers published on the Low Level
Radiation Campaign's website”. Please google HPA and ECCR to read their critique of the deeply
flawed and unscientific ECRR report.
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.21.xxx |2009-08-14 15:02:24
A dictionary definition of genocide: “the deliberate killing of a very large number of people from
a particular ethnic group or nation”. Peter and the activists that groom him claims that the use
of DU is both the “greatest genocide ever” indiscriminate, killing globally. You cannot have it
both ways, either homicide or genocide, and you have evidence of neither. To label it as genocide
is a gross insult to the countless victims of such atrocities. Are there no depths of depravity to
which you will not stoop?
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.21.xxx |2009-08-14 15:25:06
I think the simplest argument against the LLR propaganda is the knowledge that radiation is a
natural part of our environment to which we are all exposed. Their rhetoric implies that we are all
doomed, natural radiation exposures still account for our greatest dose. Our food and water contain
natural radionuclides of uranium, thorium, potassium and more. The air we breathe also contains
radon, as well as natural uranium. Our skeletons secrete natural uranium in greater quantities than
likely from DU, which these charlatans claim are killing us. Their arguments suggest that bananas
and mineral water are unsafe, granite and shale terrains must be uninhabitable!
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.21.xxx |2009-08-14 15:32:37
Leuren Moret referred to an ‘article’ in comments for the previous instalment of this ridiculous
propaganda, in order to substantiate her claims regarding DU and diabetes. It was one of the most
poorly researched articles that I have ever read, published in an alternative magazine, and with
some of the worst abuses of statistics that I have ever witnessed. She failed to identify any
references that support her opinion. Can anyone identify any evidence to support a connection
between diabetes and DU, or even with radioactivity?
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.21.xxx |2009-08-14 15:41:20
Could you justify your claim of DU activity exceeding nuclear weapons fallout? How could you
possibly get to 14 – 36 thousand times greater? The flaw in the photoelectron effect, is that it
is effected to a greater extent by other elements naturally in our bodies, than could plausibly be
created by DU intake. Busby has repeatedly failed to publish his dubious propaganda. How is that
paper on the Lebanon filters coming along? Journals would love to publish it, if it were reliable.
Where is his data, were uncontaminated background filters clean of ‘hot’ particles? That is a
relatively small track cluster, not so hot then.
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.21.xxx |2009-08-14 15:58:21
No one has shown that DU exposure can lead to any association of uranium to DNA. Potassium does bind
with DNA, and has a natural radionuclide, which surely causes this effect? What these
‘researchers’ need to do is some research to substantiate their poorly formed opinions. Instead,
they court the vulnerable and spread their propaganda. They push their agenda at the expense of
truth, abusing our sympathy for those that are ill. If there was any truth in their controversial
claims then surely they can show us some evidence?
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.21.xxx |2009-08-14 16:17:53
Where is Leuren’s epidemiological research? Certainly not in the peer-reviewed literature. The
Uranium Medical Research Centre is essentially Durakovic (of “one atom of DU is harmful” shame)
and Weyman. It does not produce any credible research. Durakovic has written peer reviewed research,
but his papers are deeply flawed. Busby consistently fails to publish his dubious research,
preferring to make controversial claims to the media. He has failed to follow these up by testing
his hypotheses. The ECRR hail Bertell as an eminent scientist, which she is not. She has authored
only 16 peer-reviewed papers during her lifetime, they are typically speculative and published in
obscure journals. See what she has to say about chem. trails and you’ll understand her lack of
scientific objectivity. When you take all of this propaganda apart you will understand that these
charlatans are not pursuing evidence based research for our benefit, but ...
Michael Smeltzer  - American Citizen   |67.142.130.xxx |2009-08-14 22:22:01
There are only two reasons DU would be used. 1. Those who thought up the use of DU as a weapon and
deployed it are "Criminally Insane". 2. DU is being used by someones or something to degrade
and or eliminate the human race from our fair planet. Either way its just plain insane and we need
to find out who ordered its use and hospitalize "for life" those we find responsible.
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.45.xxx |2009-08-15 14:45:24
Upon what conceivable evidence?
BammBamm   |139.80.58.xxx |2009-08-15 01:45:48
I work with DU every day.
I take reasonable precautions, fume hood, double glove/gown, handling,
mopping up.

1) Uranium is present naturally in our food, water, soils and rocks - even sea
water.
2) There is no evidence that uranium as yet, causes diabetes (I or II?).
3) There is ample
evidence that U ions have an affinity for the components of the cellular computers.
4) Nano
uranium? Really? I could see U3O8 forming nano precipitates, or colloidal suspensions. However their
breakdown chemistry is unknown.
5) Proximal tubule epithelial cells are highly sensitive to uranium.
Victims of DU usually have functional kidneys - why? Canine studies have shown that citrates are
involved in positive outcomes of U challenge.
6) An SEM image with no scale bar - or EDAC
projections to back it up? Yeah ...
7) No TEM of these nano particles?? Why not?

At the end of the
day - uranium is a nasty toxic material, with interesting chemistry. If you want to...
Rabbit   |203.45.33.xxx |2009-08-15 03:03:00
Why do you allow this stinking lying shill Nigel Lamb on this site?

Up yours Nigel. Leuren Moret
and Chris Busby have more credibility in their little fingers than some jumped up ass like you, and
certainly they and many other great scientists and doctors vastly outweigh the gaggle of paid shills
employed openly and by stealth to tell lies. The shills like you are pretty crumby too. This article
is solid and all the evidence, including epidemiological reports and lab studies have long since
blown the lid off this dirty secret scum like you have been trying to keep whilst the killing goes
on. Indeed it is not fair to call it a genocidal weapon.....the use of so called "depleted
uranium" weapons has been decribed as OMNICIDE.
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.5.xxx |2009-08-16 16:52:09
Busby, Moret, Bertell and Durakovic are pushing an agenda at the expense of diverting attention from
the true sufferings caused by war. If you read the scientific literature then you would know that
these charlatans’ are the minority dissenters in a well-researched field. I’m not asking you to
take my word for it, just don’t take theirs without reading around the subject a bit.
Bob Parker  - Will a Lamb dare show his non credentials?   |207.200.116.xxx |2009-08-15 05:40:00
No matter how much evidence collects and is reported on , Lamb pretends he has never heard anything
and therefore he can spread his lies and misinfo. He simply won't look at disability figures for
the US troops since DU warfare began nor will he explain the rise in cancer in Basra cited in the
article. Most glaringly Lamb cannot say who he really is nor whom he works for, but most of us can
guess.
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.5.xxx |2009-08-16 16:59:53
Guessing is your problem, seek out evidence and assess your sources, read around the subject. I
don’t trust the cancer figures because they have never been verified (they are admission data and
not per capita incidence). I do accept that Gulf War illnesses are a real problem, but I can see no
connection with DU. Few soldiers were exposed to significant amount of DU, but they were exposed to
many other stressors. The epidemiological evidence is inconclusive, but probably does not point to
DU. The vets association and IOM both concluded DU was not responsible for many, if any, of the
illnesses.
Sumiko  - radiation made in the USA and israel   |207.200.116.xxx |2009-08-15 05:47:27
The American people have never been told the terrible truth of what their nuclear weapons have done.
Their attacks on Japan were spun to the public as patriotic while images of radiation sickness
were withheld. The horrible teratogenic potential of uranium weapons has been denied by corrupt
regimes fearful of criminal prosecution. Genocide, the killing of masses of people, is apparently
the business of internet minders working for USrahell and their contractors..
' Lucky' Stroke  - thanks to peter eyre!   |207.200.116.xxx |2009-08-15 06:05:40
A big thanks to Mr. Peter Eyre from us in the world who want to live healthy lives free of war and
military radiation overburden. From the looks of the cancer spike since 1945, there is a tonload
of evidence right there of a slow genocide of world population, but defenders of radiation
contamination can only hide ignorance behind ad hominem attack of the DU investigators now
closing in on this monumental crime and stupidity.
The day 'Nigel' or whoever he is can
publish 16 peer reviewed papers like Bertell will never come. Joke critic!
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.5.xxx |2009-08-16 17:17:18
If only it were as simple as pointing at a few spikes. You have to consider all of the other
lifestyle changes and exposures that have changed before jumping to such unlikely conclusions.
Sixteen papers is not much for someone hailed as an eminent scientist by ECRR. The only one on
depleted uranium offers no active research findings and relies on anecdotal evidence to make
speculative and biased conclusions.
crlwllns  - Nuclear Re-Mediation!   |173.171.31.xxx |2009-08-15 13:49:20
It "SEEMS WEIRD", That To BE, "The Greatest & Most Powerful Country In The World"
(JUST An EGO TRIP!), One Might "KNOW" About The "Re-Mediation Of Nuclear
Waste"!

Apparently, "Some" Might "Have An "IDEA"", Yet, It IS
"PERVERTED"! As, "Nuclear Re-Mediation" DOES NOT Mean That The "Waste" Then
Turned Into Another "Weapons System", BUT, ACTUALLY, "Returned Back Into Its
"Natural State"!

And To "THINK", That "ones" Would "Get Away With
It"! And, The SAD IRONY, That "To Get RID Of The Isreali", All One Has To DO, Is
"IGNORE Nuclear Re-Mediation", & Use "D.U." In Lebanon, So The "Winds", May
Carry The "D.U. DUST" DOWN WIND! To many, Many, MANY MILLIONS, Of "Un-Suspecting"
Palestinian & Isreali Citizens!

The "Stop Loss Programmes", ARE Of "Similar
D...
Nigel Lamb  - HPA rebuttal of ECRR report   |94.196.45.xxx |2009-08-15 14:44:08
The UK’s Health Protection Agency issued a strong rebuttal of the ECRR report in 2003. You may be
interested to know that the ECRR has no mandate or endorsement from the European Parliament, and its
members are the campaign activists that I have previously criticized. The HPA statement is detailed
and soundly argues that scientific evidence does not support the ECRR report. Briefly, the ECRR uses
limited epidemiological evidence and recommends arbitrary and unscientifically justified changes to
well-established methods of dose assessment. The ECRR makes misleading claims about the established
ICRP methodologies, which are not solely based on A-bomb studies. In fact, there is supporting
evidence from studies of workers exposed to radium, radon, thorium and plutonium. You can read it
yourself on the HPA website.
Nigel Lamb  - the context of a naturally radioactive environment   |94.196.45.xxx |2009-08-15 14:50:14
The simplest argument to make against the LRR campaign activists is the context of a naturally
radioactive environment. The facts that our largest radiations doses are from natural sources, we
naturally ingest uranium from water and food, and our exposed to radionuclides from the uranium and
thorium decay chains, as well as radionuclides of potassium and even carbon, suggesting that a
minimal quantity more will not kill us all. Granite and shale terrains have significantly higher
radiation backgrounds. Many ground water and leading brands of mineral water are relatively rich in
uranium. For this reason WHO has not confirmed a threshold for drinking water, large populations
ingest relatively large quantities of uranium without apparent ill health.
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.45.xxx |2009-08-15 15:08:48
The nuclear industry (not without its many environmental crimes) takes a precautionary principle by
extrapolating down from the effects of high radiation exposure, assuming a linear a no threshold
model. The justification for this is that for the very reasons of low risk it is difficult to
observe any effects at low level radiation exposures. Whilst you can quibble about what exactly
happens at low levels, the risks of LLR are vastly exaggerated by campaigners such as Busby and
without any credible justification. The double bystander effect is disputed in the peer-reviewed
literature. The photo-electron effect is effected to a greater extent by other and more abundant
elements in the human body. The epidemiological studies cited by LRR campaigners are typically
unpublished and unscientific; they fail to test hypotheses and alternative explanations. Both the
mechanistic and empirical ‘evidence’ that these campaigners cite are clearly b...
Patrick Sullivan  - Mary had a little lamb   |67.41.63.xxx |2009-08-15 15:55:47
Mary had a little lamb whose fleece was white as snow and our nuclear war fighting members of the
Merchant murder class have little Nigel Lamb to alibi them so.

I'm not picking on you Nigel I know
how hard it is to earn an honest living, but Pimping for our nuclear war criminals? Is there not an
once of humanity in you? Would it not be better to starve oneself to death than to have any of the
depravity of the nuclear war crimes industry on ones self?

When the War Whore is finally delivered
up to a court of competent jurisdiction, those who Pimped the War Whore will also get a chance to
show us your bank books.
Peter Eyre  - Does Lamb want real evidence?   |81.152.68.xxx |2009-08-16 02:31:40
Would Lamb ever accept evidence from a PubMed Journal on US Goverment webpage that DU is a health
risk? Would Lamb ever accept evidence from the US Army that DU is a health risk? Would Lamb accept a
IMVA report on the connection between DU and Diabetes? Would Lamb accept a report from a leading WHO
expert who blew the whisle? He wants medical journals but would he really accept them? of course
not! He's truly a Lamb in Sheep's Clothing..This man is an imbecile & a traitor to thousands of war
vets & innocent victims of DU. He's an agent who sold his soul to the devil!!
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.5.xxx |2009-08-16 16:39:22
I will happily accept any peer-reviewed research that shows the risks from DU. Will you point me to
some – not the speculative discussion pieces, but the studies that actually investigate and assess
risk. I don’t accept an IMVA opinion piece, as it provides no evidence of any connection to DU,
just some of Bertell’s waffle (hear her opinions on chem. trails). Show me some primary evidence!
I don’t deny there is risk, but I do not think they are significant. Life is risky. I know that
the claims made by these activists are outrageously exaggerated, to the point of deception and
propaganda. I also doubt DU weapons have been used in Gaza or the Lebanon. .
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.5.xxx |2009-08-16 17:32:38
The IMVA ‘report’ is laughable. It’s a common tactic amongst alternative ‘researchers’ to
cite a few alarming but familiar facts to the reader, and then intersperse their unsubstantiated
opinions between them. Take a fact: diabetes is rising, reference it, looking scientific so far.
Gloss over “Even though there is little research into the connection between radiation poisoning
and diabetes we should not remain blind, deaf and dumb about it.” Sounds considered and balanced.
Then hit the gullible with “Type two diabetes, which is fundamentally due to nutritional
deficiencies (especially a lack of magnesium), colliding head on with a host of chemical poisons and
heavy metals, is also being triggered by the heavy metal toxicity and radioactivity of uranium oxide
and other radioactive isotopes that are circulating widely in the environment.” They won’t
remember the previous statement because it all looks so scientific.
Nigel Lamb  - More IMVA meaningless statements   |94.196.5.xxx |2009-08-16 17:37:57
“Though allopathic medicine likes to define everything, including water as toxic or as a poison,
there are in reality certain medicinal substances, including water, that have no side effects even
at high doses” [presumably excepting downing?]. Anyone for: “goes against a gale wind of medical
science to ignore magnesium chloride used transdermally and orally in the treatment of any chronic
or acute disorder, especially cancer”. That could be the cure for the people who weren’t exposed
to the material that hasn’t been shown to cause anyone harm.
zeist   |58.181.109.xxx |2009-08-16 06:34:34
does nigel lamb think he can impress us with his ''globbdygook'' ?? speak english man !!! i would
like to write to tell you how much i appreciate the article by peter eyre.. i know how the south
asian countries are getting affected with multiple cancers and diabetes .. it is sad and shameful
that humans ( can we call ourselves that ??) do so much harm to other humans and probably relish it
too.. these ''superior '' beings probably think ''they'' deserve it.. well i am indeed sorry to say
that i have to stoop down and declare.. i am sooooooooo glad that the whole world will get
affected.. ( sorry for being sadistic but when we have been through it all .. it is not hard to be
like that .. the non humans are making us non humans too ..) WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND ... THERE
IS JUSTICE ... AS BELIEVERS WE KNOW IF NOT HERE THEN DEFINATELY ''THERE'' i thank you for your
attention.. hoping to hear more from peter eyre.. who shows his humanity...
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.5.xxx |2009-08-16 16:44:03
That’s a bit rich, I might make a few typos, but your contribution is not exactly coherrent prose.
I guess the problem is that there are too many believers taking these charlatans at face value.
Patrick Sullivan  - A little over board   |65.101.170.xxx |2009-08-16 18:36:04
I probably went a little overboard with you Nigel talking about a trial court looking into your bank
book to see how much you are paid to shill for such a dastardly bunch.

We probably won't have any
war crimes trials either, not that they would be a bad thing, it just seems that it could slow our
implementation of Peace.

Depleted Uranium and spreading it upon the people of this planet may go
down in history as the worst criminal act ever perpetrated against the human race, except for
Hiroshima, Nagasaki and building tens of thousands of nuclear weapons with which to kill us all
with.

What we need to do Nigel is to get control of the issue of money so that all the people of
your troubled land can have an access to the resource base and not go cold and hungry as children
and not trigger deprivation induced aggression against other people.

You don't need a spanking
Nigel, mere social and economic Justice would solve your privation induc...
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.170.xxx |2009-08-17 15:28:06
A bit forward of you Patrick, and spanking is not my thing. Sounds like you’ve got the politics
all sorted out, good luck finding some science to support it. Come the revolution and I’ll call on
your support if it comes to war trials. I find this whole charade a bit tasteless, it sounds a bit
inflammatory to me, more likely to perpetuate violence in the Middle East than achieve world peace.
We’re not doing too badly on social justice here, one cold and hungry child would be too many, but
it’s the children in place like Gaza that I think we should be concentrating on.
Nigel Lamb  - Erratum for Peter’s article   |94.196.219.xxx |2009-08-17 19:30:18
Activity released Hiroshima: 8 million billion billion Bq. Activity of 320 tonnes DU: about 5
thousand billion. Peter statement exaggerates by several thousand billion times, but who is
counting? ECRR derived their bogus claims by multiplying by arbitrary and unscientifically
justifiable factors. What’s your excuse Peter? Or did those charlatans from UMRC put you up to it?
Peter Eyre  - Childen of Gaza   |81.152.68.xxx |2009-08-19 02:29:08
Re concentrating on the children of Gaza? Thanks to US weaponry & the IDF the children of Gaza do
not have a bright future. Private investigators have samples from Gaza showing DU/EU contamination.
The UN has accelerated the clean up without first checking for DU/EU (against their own policy).
Just think for one whole year they will bury some evidence and whats left will be crushed and spread
around the Gaza strip on the roads. This will generate high level secondary contamination.Just think
how many more children will now fall victim to this. Does anyone care for the children? you
certainly do not as you support those that use DU. Do they pay good money to agents like you? You
have sold your soul to spread this verbal diarrhoea and your day will come beleive me!!
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.89.xxx |2009-08-19 19:31:53
Petit threats Peter. What you haven’t got is evidence that DU was even used in Gaza, nor have you
any evidence that it has ever caused anyone any harm. Just some baseless propaganda to peddle. I am
suspicious of anything Busby says because he never follows it up beyond the media, these sound
similar to the spurious claims that Busby made for Lebanon. He is primarily an activist with a
political agenda and little evidence of any credible scientific research. I don’t support DU
weapons, but I do defend them against the unsubstantiated and baseless claims that these campaign
activists are making.
Nigel Lamb  - Major flaw in ‘CR39 evidence'   |94.196.89.xxx |2009-08-19 19:49:50
Major flaw in ‘CR39 evidence’: there is a low probability that a single track would be detected
from an 80 micron DU particle in 15 hours using this method! Therefore, Busby’s hot particle was
not from DU! As I’ve said many times previously, environmental materials are naturally
radioactive. There are many naturally radioactive minerals; there are also anthropogenic
radionuclides from a variety of sources. A piece of plastic cannot readily discriminate DU from
these sources, but in this instance rules it out! The other side of the plastic is a blank and not a
control; he needs a background air filter. If that photo shows both sides then there he has a high
blank problem? It may well be a random cluster of whatever caused the other pits, and they don’t
appear to originate from a single particle. Instead of spouting rubbish, Busby should analyse his
hot particle and find out what it was. I’m guessing a natural mineral sand grain...
Pierre Frankfurt  - Nigel Lamb is really Roger Helbig   |81.152.68.xxx |2009-08-23 03:34:47
For those that didnt read the other comments on story 5 someone has just revealed that Nigel Lamb
is really Roger Helbig.....just pull up this ex USAF Col Roger Helbig and see his background. Now we
can all get back to serious talk again
Anonymous   |94.196.58.xxx |2009-08-25 18:42:49
Nonsense Pierre, you are talking rubbish again and making false claims.
Nigel Lamb   |94.196.58.xxx |2009-08-25 18:44:17
Nonsense Pierre, you are talking rubbish again and making false claims.
soopy  - nigel lies again   |207.200.116.xxx |2009-08-30 19:21:42
Nigel or whoever this lier is said that there would be more bequerel in the Hiroshima bomb than 320
tons of DU. That is categorically false. Nigel, care to show us your calculation?
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Comments Posted do not reflect PT views

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Friday, 14 August 2009 10:43 )  

Newsflash

Advertise with us

adv

The Palestine Telegraph is one of the most read online Papers in the Middle East.By Advertising with us, you will have thousands of hits directed to your websitse.

 

Our prices are moderate and you can judge.

Contact us on:
info@paltelegraph.com

or

0044- (0) 7949725139

 

 

Weather

06:2312:2918:37
Jerusalem, Palestine

Share PT

Hot topic

 

Australian Speaking Tour : Sameh Habeeb

World, March 16, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) -Socialist Alternative is very proud to announce a speaking ...

 

Gaza Amputee Girl Struggles to Live on after War

  Gaza, December 24, 2009 (Pal Telegraph) - Every morning, Jamila Al Habbash gets up early to get ...

 

Madoff in Jerusalem by Gilad Atzmon

World, March 20, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) -Zionism, at least in its early days was premised on the be...

 

Howard Zinn, American advocate for Palestine, dies

Boston, January 29, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) - The Jan. 29 online edition of the Washington Post has rep...

 

The dark face of Jewish nationalism

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu once remarked to a Likud gathering that "Isr...

 

Gaza Calamity...Until When?!

Gaza January 4, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) -The massacre on Gaza has ended... But what is after that?! Qui...

Al-Jazeera English News

AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (MIDDLE EAST)
Al Jazeera Network

search


Add Site to FavoritesAdd Page to FavoritesMake HomepagePrint This PageShare This PageSave Page as PDFEmail This Page

Translate

Your Language:
DeutschFrancaisEspanolItalianoArabischJapanischNiederländischRussischSchwedischChinesisch

User Statistics

Registered users : 1914
Online : 544
Guest : 542
Members : 2

Online members
Jamesnasir
Jamesnasir
Advertise with Palestine Telegraph
Banner